Article Sidebar

Submitted
Aug 5, 2020
Published
Oct 31, 2020
Download
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 362 Download : 713

Main Article Content

Abstract

Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) is a forest resource that has an important role for the welfare of the communities around the forests, particularly in protected forest areas. Honey is one of NTFPs that have long been used in West Nusa Tenggara province. Increased national honey production is needed to be able to meet the high demand of honey in Indonesia. One of the way to increase production of honey is by doing beekeeping. This study aims to obtain information about the financial feasibility in Protected Forest Management Unit (KPHL) West Rinjani.  Sample collection has been done by using purposive sampling method with consideration of the number of holdings stup/the most bee colonies. Research analysis has been done by using a combination of quantitative-qualitative method. Financial analysis conducted to determine the feasibility of beekeeping using investment criteria NPV, BCR and IRR in KPHL Rinjani Barat.The result show that the cultivation of honey bee Apis cerana types in Resort Malimbu feasible with NPV = Rp. 104 229 381 - Rp.1.036.687.824 / 10 years; BCR = 2.85 to 5.79; IRR = 40.92% - 42.34%. Enterprises beekeeping types of Trigona sp in Resort Malimbu also feasible with NPV = Rp. 45,491,153 - Rp. 92,973,767 / 10 years;BCR = 1.21 to 1.34; IRR = 23.52% - 27.91%.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Bertrand O. (1994). Education and Work. Pages: 5 – 8. Paris, UNESCO.
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2016). Nusa Tenggara Barat dalam angka. Pages: 235. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat.
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik. 2012-2016. Jawa Barat dalam angka. Pages: 261 – 374. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Barat.
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2016). Nusa Tenggara Timur dalam angka. Pages: 240 - 320. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur.
  5. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2016). Sulawesi Tenggara dalam angka. Pages: 291 – 338. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara.
  6. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2016). Sumatera Barat dalam angka. Pages: 354 – 468. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Sumatera Barat.
  7. Bank Indonesia. 2012. Pola pembiayaan usaha kecil (PPUK): Budidaya lebah madu. Pages: 11. Tersedia pada http://www.bi.go.id/id/umkm/kelayakan/ pola-pembiayaan/ peternakan/documents/4f32c79c16a64d9aad5cec0e4b712 ba6budidayalebahmadu1.pdf (diakses januari 2016).
  8. Bishop, J.T. (1999). Valuing Forests: A Review of Methods and Applications in Developing Countries. Pages 38-45. International Institute for Environment and Development. London.
  9. Chen, W., Xu D dan Liu, J. (2015). The forest resourcers unput-uotput model: An application in China. Ecological Indicators 51: 87 – 97.
  10. Cronkleton, P., Larson, A. M., Feintrenie, L., Garcia, C. dan Levang, P. 2013. Reframing Commuity Forestry to Manage The Forest-Farm Interface. Small-scale Forestry 12: 5 – 13.
  11. Damette, O., & Dalcote, P. (2011). Unsustainable timber harvesting, deforestation and the role of certification. Ecological Economics 70: 1211 – 1219.
  12. Dupas, P., Green, S., Keats, A., & Robinson, J. (2012). Challenges in banking the rural poor : Evidence from Kenya’s western province. National Bureau Of Economic Research : 1 – 19.
  13. El-Niweiri, M. A. A., & Moritz, R. F. A. (2009). The impact of apiculture on the genetic structure of wild honeybee populations (Apis mellifera) in Sudan. Jourrnal of Insect Conservation 14: 115 – 124.
  14. Gebremichael, B., & Gebremedhin, B. (2014). Adoption of improved box hive technology: Analysis of smallholder farmers in Northern Ethiopia. Journal of Agriculturan Economics 2: 77 – 82.
  15. Hadisoesilo, S. (2001). Keanekaragaman spesies lebah madu asli Indonesia. Biodiversitas 2: 123 – 128.
  16. Hilmi, M., Nicola, B., dan Danilo, M. (2011). Beekeeping and Sustainable Livelihoods. Pages: 2 – 22. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome.
  17. Kilchling, P., Hansmann dan Seeland, K. (2009). Demand for non-timber forest products : Surveys of urban consumers and sellers in Switzerland. Forest Policy and Economics 11: 294-300.
  18. Kleij, C. V. D., dan Simukoko, M. (2012). Women Participation In Beekeeping In Zambia Through The Use Of Technological Innovation. SNV Netherlands Development Organisation 1 – 4.
  19. Rangkuti, F. (2009). Strategi Promosi Yang Kreatif dan Analisis Kasus Integrated Marketing Communication. Pages: 241 – 244. Jakarta, PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  20. Sisak, L., Riedl, M., & Dudik, R. (2016). Non-market non-timber forest products in the Czech Republic their socio-economic effects and trends in forest land use. Land Use Policy 50: 390 – 398.
  21. Sumargo, W., Nanggara, S. G., Nainggolan, F. A., & Apriani, I. (2011). Potret Keadaan Hutan Indonesia : Periode Tahun 2000-2009. Pages: 15-29. Forest Watch Indonesia. Indonesia.
  22. UNESCO. (2012). Education and Skills for Inclusive and Sustainable Development Beyond 2015. Tersedia pada http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/Think %20Pieces/4education.pdf (diakses oktober 2016).